Semper Reformanda

Some thoughts on the Church, theology, books, and whatever else.

My Photo
Name:
Location: St. Peters, Missouri, United States

I am studying philosophy at Lindenwood Universtiy in St. Charles Missouri. I have a brother and a sister, two great parents and we are all members of New Covenant Church. After I graduate, I'm planning on attending Covenant Theological Seminary.

Monday, April 17, 2006

Calvin and the Lord's Supper

Here's a recent paper that I've written on Calvin's doctrine of the Lord's Supper. The subject of the presence of Christ at the communion table is one that is virtually neglected by evangelicals altogether. Whether we realize it or not, most evangelicals hold to a Zwinglian or memorialist view of the table. In other words, Christ is not truly present in the Eucharist meal, but rather, we simply remember Christ's death. However, this is position is in one that has been held by a minority of Christians throughout the course of Church history. At the time of the Reformation, it was the controversy over how Christ's presence in the meal was to be understood that was the major issue dividing Protestants. While Luther held to an understanding of the real physical presence, similar to that of the Roman Catholic position, Zwingli denied any sort of real presence.

Calvin's doctrine was an attempt to moderate between these two positions. It maintains that Christ is truly present with his people in table, but he is with them spiritually. Christ's body and blood do not become bread and wine, but rather, bread and wine are means consecrated by God to bring us into the presence of Christ through the agency of the Holy Spirit. In a Church culture that continues to diminish the place of the Eucharist in the gathering of the congregation, an understanding of Calvin's doctrine would do much to restore a reverence for the grace communicated to us through the Lord's Supper. For myself, nothing has done more to transform the communion table from a place of meaningless ritual to a source of joy and thanksgiving for the work of Christ than has Calvin's articulation of this doctrine. Keith Mathison's book, Given For You: Reclaiming Calvin's Doctrine of the Lord's Supper, is an excellent resource on the subject.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Important topic and excellent paper, Andrew. I appreciated your
reference to Matheson's impression of Calvin's "suprasubstantiation."

Questions for your consideration, and others, sparked by your post:

Assuming the supernatural significance of covenant renewal at the Lord's Table, does this sacramental celebration also include a judicial element, as well as our individual and corporate responses to and remembrance of God's sacrificial
mercy?

In other words, what about the legal admonition by the Apostle Paul in 1 Cor. 11: 27-34?

Is this passage related to the more general topic of theonomy,
biblical ethics, etc. as essential to our new covenant with Jesus Christ, not just at the assembly, but in all of life?

Paul was addressing the ethically-challenged church at Corinth.

Does such Holy-Ghost instruction have timeless application; for example, to our contemporary ethically-challenged church, both locally and globally, as believers
who function in all spheres of the culture?

If so, therefore, is the King's judicial presence -- as well as His covenantal grace and mercy -- a useful topic for understanding the full meaning of the Table?

What would be its practical outworking, according to scripture?

Would the knowledge of potential judgement be one of the reasons the
Table is celebrated so seldom among most Christians ... like the Corinthians: an inherent anti-law character?

10:58 AM  
Blogger Andrew Stout said...

Centurion,

Thanks for the observations! It is not my goal to get into the finer points of theonomy in this post, so I'll set that topic aside.

In thinking about the judicial aspect of the Supper, my thought is simply that the potential for judgment should point us to the righteousness of Christ. If we come to the table with a confidence in our own merit or righteousness, we shall surely be found guilt and worthy of death. The table should move us to great thanksgiving, realizing that we are judged in Christ and not in ourselves.

I realize that you’re looking for more than this, but this is really all that I'm confident to say on the matter.

8:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I appreciate and agree with your response, Andrew. I raised the questions mainly in the context of
the impotent "memorial-only" tradition, and the relative infrequency by which so many partake of this glorious sacrament.

I heard a story years ago of an adulterous pastor whose congregation celebrated at the Table four times year, a not-uncommon schedule among evangelicals and charismatics.

Because of his sin and troubled conscience, he always managed to be out of town on those Sundays.

Theonomy in action.

Grace intervened and his marriage was salvaged, but not his ministry.

Again, the text that prompted by
earlier post was 1 Cor. 11-27-34.
I enjoyed your reply.

Cheers, in Christ!

11:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home